Regulation M-CDoubles ladderSep 16–28, 2026

Bring Four.

Maushold-Four

On 1.1% of teams at all Elo. It wins 46.0% of games it is in the preview for, clearly below even, and ranks 108 of 172 ranked species on that measure. Above 1300 it wins 50.3% (+4.3 pp), rank 31 of 77. Why the splits differ.

Seen on the ladder

3,779 games brought1.6 moves shown per game19% showed an item2% showed an ability

In the 3,779 games it was brought, it used Follow Me in 51% and Population Bomb in 29%. The item seen most is Focus Sash, in 6%.

Moves used

  1. Follow Me51%
  2. Population Bomb29%
  3. Protect22%
  4. Super Fang15%
  5. Beat Up10%
  6. Taunt9%
  7. Encore6%
  8. Feint4%

Items revealed

  1. Focus Sash6%
  2. Chople Berry5%
  3. Sitrus Berry4%
  4. Rocky Helmet3%

Abilities revealed

None revealed in 2% or more of its games.

Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.

All Elo

1.1% of teams59% brought40% lead6,499 teams

On-team WR
46.095% CI 44.8–47.2 · n 6,439Every game it was in the preview.
Full-reveal WR
46.395% CI 44.3–48.3 · n 2,366Brought, both sides showed four.
Lead WR
45.795% CI 43.8–47.7 · n 2,575Games it led.

Partners, best to worst

No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.

0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.

Counters

Its side wins least against Gholdengo: 43.8% (CI 40.9–46.8, n 1,089). It does best against Golisopod, at 47.6%. Of 8 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against seven and clearly above against zero.

Opponents, hardest first

  1. Gholdengo43.840.9–46.8 · n 1,089 · 471 players
  2. Rillaboom44.342.4–46.2 · n 2,648 · 710 players
  3. Kingambit44.441.6–47.3 · n 1,180 · 476 players
  4. Sneasler44.842.8–46.9 · n 2,184 · 667 players
  5. Salamence45.042.6–47.5 · n 1,601 · 588 players
  6. Incineroar45.943.6–48.3 · n 1,755 · 613 players
  7. Indeedee-F46.143.5–48.7 · n 1,438 · 581 players
  8. Golisopod47.644.6–50.5 · n 1,095 · 493 players

On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.

Leads

It is in the opening pair in 40% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Gardevoir, in 10% of its leads, and that lead wins 56.4% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.

Most common lead partners

  1. Gardevoir56.410% of its leads · 50.4–62.2 · n 266 · 16 players · thin
  2. Annihilape54.310% of its leads · 48.2–60.3 · n 254 · 63 players · thin
  3. Absol41.75% of its leads · 33.2–50.6 · n 120 · 43 players · thin
  4. Gengar42.04% of its leads · 32.8–51.8 · n 100 · 32 players · thin
  5. Indeedee-F39.14% of its leads · 29.8–49.3 · n 92 · 22 players · thin

Best-winning lead partners

No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.

Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.

Elo ≥ 1300

0.9% of teams64% brought50% lead1,103 teams

On-team WR
50.395% CI 47.4–53.3 · n 1,101Every game it was in the preview.
Full-reveal WR
46.7thin95% CI 42.1–51.3 · n 450Brought, both sides showed four.
Lead WR
48.9thin95% CI 44.7–53.1 · n 540Games it led.

Partners, best to worst

No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.

0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.

Counters

No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.

Leads

It is in the opening pair in 50% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Gardevoir, in 28% of its leads, and that lead wins 55.6% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.

Most common lead partners

  1. Gardevoir55.628% of its leads · 47.7–63.3 · n 151 · 7 players · thin
  2. Annihilape57.315% of its leads · 46.5–67.5 · n 82 · 16 players · thin

Best-winning lead partners

No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.

Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.