Rotom-Wash
On 1.6% of teams at all Elo. It wins 46.0% of games it is in the preview for, clearly below even, and ranks 109 of 172 ranked species on that measure.
Seen on the ladder
5,353 games brought1.6 moves shown per game46% showed an item10% showed an ability
In the 5,353 games it was brought, it used Hydro Pump in 37% and Will-O-Wisp in 30%. The item seen most is Leftovers, in 22%.
Moves used
Items revealed
Abilities revealed
Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.
All Elo
1.6% of teams60% brought35% lead9,100 teams
- On-team WR
- 46.095% CI 44.9–47.0 · n 8,940Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 45.395% CI 43.7–46.9 · n 3,735Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 43.595% CI 41.8–45.2 · n 3,102Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
Its side wins least against Archaludon: 39.6% (CI 36.7–42.5, n 1,117). It does best against Indeedee-F, at 47.3%. Of 15 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against 15 and clearly above against zero.
Hardest opponents
- Archaludon39.6
- Pelipper43.6
- Rillaboom44.5
- Garchomp44.6
- Salamence44.8
Easiest opponents
- Indeedee-F47.3
- Golisopod46.5
- Incineroar46.4
- Farigiraf46.1
- Kingambit45.8
On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 35% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Garchomp, in 8% of its leads, and that lead wins 52.9% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Garchomp52.9
- Sneasler45.3
- Incineroar39.1
- Salamence41.9
- Sceptile40.5
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.
Elo ≥ 1300
0.8% of teams60% brought36% lead1,053 teams
- On-team WR
- 45.6thin95% CI 42.6–48.7 · n 1,045Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 44.4thin95% CI 40.0–49.0 · n 459Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 44.6thin95% CI 39.7–49.6 · n 381Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 36% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Gholdengo, in 9% of its leads, and that lead wins 45.5% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.