Scovillain
On 1.2% of teams at all Elo. It wins 48.9% of games it is in the preview for, within noise of even, and ranks 59 of 172 ranked species on that measure. Above 1300 it wins 50.5% (+1.6 pp), rank 26 of 77. Why the splits differ.
Seen on the ladder
3,799 games brought1.8 moves shown per game87% showed an item82% showed an ability85% Mega Evolved
In the 3,799 games it was brought, it used Rage Powder in 53% and Protect in 41%. The item seen most is Scovillainite, in 86%.
Moves used
Items revealed
Abilities revealed
After Mega Evolution
Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.
All Elo
1.2% of teams54% brought40% lead7,073 teams
- On-team WR
- 48.995% CI 47.7–50.0 · n 6,977Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 48.195% CI 46.1–50.0 · n 2,534Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 46.795% CI 44.9–48.6 · n 2,813Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
Its side wins least against Sneasler: 46.8% (CI 44.8–48.8, n 2,391). It does best against Golisopod, at 50.8%. Of 11 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against three and clearly above against zero.
Hardest opponents
- Sneasler46.8
- Indeedee-F47.5
- Kingambit47.6
- Salamence47.6
- Rillaboom48.1
Easiest opponents
- Golisopod50.8
- Gholdengo50.1
- Incineroar49.5
- Farigiraf49.4
- Garchomp49.1
On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 40% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Kingambit, in 9% of its leads, and that lead wins 47.1% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.
Elo ≥ 1300
1.2% of teams54% brought41% lead1,583 teams
- On-team WR
- 50.595% CI 48.0–53.0 · n 1,563Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 49.1thin95% CI 45.1–53.2 · n 584Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 47.4thin95% CI 43.6–51.3 · n 637Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 41% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Gholdengo, in 14% of its leads, and that lead wins 46.0% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.