Tsareena
On 1.2% of teams at all Elo. It wins 48.4% of games it is in the preview for, clearly below even, and ranks 66 of 172 ranked species on that measure. Above 1300 it wins 49.7% (+1.3 pp), rank 45 of 77. Why the splits differ.
Seen on the ladder
3,801 games brought1.4 moves shown per game14% showed an item25% showed an ability
In the 3,801 games it was brought, it used Triple Axel in 28% and Power Whip in 22%. The item seen most is Sitrus Berry, in 5%.
Moves used
Items revealed
Abilities revealed
Share of the games it was brought in which it showed each move, item or ability at least once, all Elo. Moves only show when used, items and abilities only when they trigger, so these are floors, not set frequencies. Open team sheets are not used. How reveals are counted.
All Elo
1.2% of teams56% brought21% lead6,929 teams
- On-team WR
- 48.495% CI 47.2–49.6 · n 6,825Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 46.995% CI 45.0–48.8 · n 2,616Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 46.295% CI 43.6–48.8 · n 1,423Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
Its side wins least against Golisopod: 45.2% (CI 42.4–48.1, n 1,163). It does best against Gholdengo, at 50.1%. Of 11 opposing species with enough games, it is clearly below even against four and clearly above against zero.
Hardest opponents
- Golisopod45.2
- Garchomp46.0
- Basculegion46.8
- Farigiraf47.3
- Salamence47.7
Easiest opponents
- Gholdengo50.1
- Indeedee-F49.6
- Incineroar49.6
- Rillaboom49.3
- Kingambit48.2
On-team win rate of its side when the opponent’s preview has that species. Games where both previews hold both are left out. Cells need n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 21% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Whimsicott, in 9% of its leads, and that lead wins 49.6% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Whimsicott49.6
- Aerodactyl54.4
- Milotic42.9
- Garchomp46.2
- Salamence54.9
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.
Elo ≥ 1300
1.1% of teams55% brought19% lead1,434 teams
- On-team WR
- 49.795% CI 47.1–52.3 · n 1,414Every game it was in the preview.
- Full-reveal WR
- 46.7thin95% CI 42.4–51.0 · n 512Brought, both sides showed four.
- Lead WR
- 49.6thin95% CI 43.7–55.5 · n 272Games it led.
Partners, best to worst
No pair clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
0 partner pairs qualify (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Pair WR counts only games where both sides revealed all four.
Counters
No opposing species clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Leads
It is in the opening pair in 19% of games it is on a team for. Its usual lead partner is Whimsicott, in 29% of its leads, and that lead wins 57.7% (thin sample). No lead with it clears the sample bar yet.
Most common lead partners
- Whimsicott57.7
Best-winning lead partners
No lead with it clears the sample and player thresholds yet.
Lead: the two species on the field at turn 1. Win rate excludes lead mirrors. Greyed rows are below the bar (n ≥ 500, CI ≤ ±3 pp, ≥ 50 distinct players). Leads are chosen after team preview.